(2009-04-27) — Since the Obama administration’s talk of banning so-called ‘assault weapons’ has resulted in a huge spike in semi-automatic weapon sales nationwide, the White House has recently begun a covert ‘whisper campaign’ suggesting the president might also ban U.S.-manufactured cars and trucks with fully-automatic transmissions, now dubbed ‘assault vehicles’.
President Obama reportedly hopes such chatter will give a much-needed boost to U.S. auto sales.
“These fully-automatics are the weapon-of-choice in the vehicular-manslaughter industry,” said one unnamed White House source. “The automatic transmission allows the killer to accelerate rapidly without the manual process of clutching and shifting gears. Assault vehicles murder roughly four times as many people each year as do firearms. If you include suicides, cars still kill nearly twice as many people compared with all types of guns.”
The administration source also noted that while people with criminal records make up the vast majority of gun-murder victims, ‘assault vehicles’ kill indiscriminately, murdering 39,800 Americans in 2008 alone.
“In most homicide-by-firearm cases, it’s one crook killing another,” said the source. “But automatic transmissions turn law-abiding citizens into killers of other law-abiding citizens, including women, children, seniors and innocent pedestrians.”
Publicly, the administration maintains that it supports an individual’s ‘right to keep and be borne upon wheels’, but the sophisticated whisper campaign is designed both to curry favor with the anti-car lobby, and to boost the economy by driving panic demand for fully automatics.
67 responses so far ↓
1 JamesonLewis3rd // Apr 27, 2009 at 8:36 am
God Bless America
2 onlineanalyst // Apr 27, 2009 at 9:09 am
Is is one of Obama’s “Five Pillars of the Economy” (Where have I heard about five pillars before ???) to keep America in his clutches?
3 boberinyetagain // Apr 27, 2009 at 9:30 am
Very amusing Mr. Ott…might just work too!
4 R.A.M. // Apr 27, 2009 at 10:32 am
Will there be enough vehicles to drive us all to the poor house Mr. Obama?
5 Laughing@You // Apr 27, 2009 at 10:45 am
Breaking News!
A recent poll indicates voters who identify themselves as Republicans is now down to 21% from the previous 29%!
Please, keep up the good work!
Everthink?
6 camojack // Apr 27, 2009 at 10:55 am
Fully automatic transmissions, eh? Too funny…
7 JamesonLewis3rd // Apr 27, 2009 at 11:36 am
The unsubstantiated suggestion that 79% of an undisclosed group of “voters” supposedly admitted to being members of the Democrat party is ludicrous.
8 boberinyetagain // Apr 27, 2009 at 11:56 am
I agree, I’m sure that many are Democrats but most won’t admit such a thing…they’d likely be shot if they did…and/or preached to…
9 upnorthlurkin // Apr 27, 2009 at 12:39 pm
Yeah, cuz all those crazies out there shootin’ up the place are Republicans….
What a putz. Why not insult the military too, Bob?! How ’bout cops while you’re at it?!
10 boberinyetagain // Apr 27, 2009 at 12:57 pm
upnorth, read the story…it alleges that ‘pubs are buying assault weapons for fear they may be banned.
Sheesh….
11 Laughing@You // Apr 27, 2009 at 1:18 pm
Lurch,
“Why not insult the military too, Bob?”
Bob has had at least one of his children in the military, as have I.
How about you?
As a former member of the military and a former cop myself I find no insult in his comment. Why don’t you quit hiding behind your phony concern for the troops?
Everthink?
12 upnorthlurkin // Apr 27, 2009 at 1:22 pm
And, what’s wrong with that?! We just purchased a new one….for that very reason.
13 Laughing@You // Apr 27, 2009 at 1:23 pm
“Yeah, cuz all those crazies out there shootin’ up the place are Republicans…”
So it seems.
There have been threats of similar action voiced here under the guise of patriotism!
Everthink?
14 Laughing@You // Apr 27, 2009 at 1:38 pm
“The unsubstantiated suggestion that 79% of an undisclosed group of “voters” supposedly admitted to being members of the Democrat party is ludicrous.”
Where is my suggestion? In which words?
Apparently, 8% more, of an already small number, have divorced the Republican Party. I didn’t say they had remarried.
Everthink?
15 boberinyetagain // Apr 27, 2009 at 1:57 pm
upnorth, and I’ll bet the bunnies know to stay out of your garden! Making the world safer through armements…keep up the good work!
16 Rita-of-Sunland // Apr 27, 2009 at 2:00 pm
Don’t you guys get it? Our young, vital, president-of-color is playing “stern task-master” with ludicrous luxury for our own GOOD. Why should we be able to effortlessly slide thru 3rd, 4th, 5th, and then into a manical full-tilt OVERDRIVE whenever we feel like it? Just becuz we own the thing? Come on! Obama wants us to appreciate every stage of vehicular acceleration so we’ll know where we’re going and where we’ve been and take nothing for granted. We see his same signature strictness applied to all other political issues he grapples with as well….like economics, immigration, welfare, health care, poverty, right? No more free ride! No more—- uh, wait a minute…..Nevermind…
17 upnorthlurkin // Apr 27, 2009 at 2:04 pm
It’s called Peace through (strength)Superior Fire Power, Bob….
And, the dog handles the bunnies quite well, thank you. It’s still illegal to discharge a weapon inside the city limits…
18 boberinyetagain // Apr 27, 2009 at 2:12 pm
Obama, “Sportsmen”: Barack Obama believes the Second Amendment creates an individual right, and he respects the constitutional rights of Americans to bear arms. He will protect the rights of hunters and other law-abiding Americans to purchase, own, transport, and use guns.
Obama, “Urban Policy”: Obama and Biden also favor commonsense measures that respect the Second Amendment rights of gun owners, while keeping guns away from children and from criminals who shouldn’t have them. They support closing the gun show loophole and making guns in this country childproof. They also support making the expired federal Assault Weapons Ban permanent, as such weapons belong on foreign battlefields and not on our streets.
“As President, I will uphold the constitutional rights of law-abiding gun-owners, hunters, and sportsmen. I know that what works in Chicago may not work in Cheyenne. We can work together to enact common-sense laws, like closing the gun show loophole and improving our background check system, so that guns do not fall into the hands of terrorists or criminals. Today’s decision reinforces that if we act responsibly, we can both protect the constitutional right to bear arms and keep our communities and our children safe.”
19 JamesonLewis3rd // Apr 27, 2009 at 2:28 pm
I like the way BHO terrorized NYC today and burned thousands of gallons of jet fuel in the process.
Hilarious, eh?
~~~~~
Yes, it is true, I should have used the word “implication” instead of “suggestion” in my previous comment.
My point, to the traitor to whom I was responding, was that the alleged “poll” is bogus, if it even exists.
20 Fred Sinclair // Apr 27, 2009 at 3:13 pm
Perhaps B.O. should push to ban fully automatic Amnesties. This newest fully automatic amnesty bill is far more dangerous to America than an AK-47, MAC-10 or a UZI, 9mm with taped 30 round magazines. I just got a video about some of the more horrendous aspects of the bill. If it makes it through Congress, B.O. is sure to sign it and automatically the provisions will make the hairs on the back your neck stand at attention. If you are able to sleep comfortably it will be only because you don’t understand the bill and it’s ramifications.
House Minority Leader, John Baynor referred to this piece of Amnesty legislation, currently making it’s way through Congress, as a piece of (expletive deleted). Or in the words of the late, former President of the United States, Teddy Roosevelt: “Pure Horsefeathers!” (and that, at best, could only be construed as an overly generous ‘understatement’!!!)
Some of the more outrageous provisions:
A.) Illegal aliens will be given legal status within 24 hours of applying for the amnesty whether background checks have been completed or not (a literal impossibility);
B.) Illegal aliens, making application for amnesty, will have all legal expenses paid by the American taxpayers;
C.) Illegal aliens who are known gang members (currently estimated to be 30,000) can apply for amnesty by simply stating, “I no longer wish to be a gang member”;
D.) Monies will be paid to Mexican Government to provide incentives for Mexicans to remain in Mexico, ie: education programs, health care benefits, etc.;
E.) “Fast track” on legislation to eradicate borders between the U.S.A. – Mexico and Canada, ala Europe’s Common Market;
F.) The proposed 700 mile fence to be shortened to 200 miles;
G.) Illegal aliens will be given “in state” tuition at all colleges;
H.) Illegal aliens, applying for college entrance will automatically be placed at the head of the applications list (”Jump the line” legally by Federal mandate);
I.) Illegal aliens are automatically relieved of any back taxes on previously earned income;
J.) Illegal aliens are eligible for earned tax rebates (reverse income tax);
K.) Illegal aliens will have the requirement to learn English extended to nine years after the amnesty bill’s date of enactment.
These are just the ones I can remember. The entire Amnesty Bill is a nightmare of gargantuan proportions (the kind where you awaken in a torrential sweat with soaked bedsheets – sort of a scene from a really scary horror movie). Only, unlike “The Night of the Walking Dead” we cannot stand up, leave our seat and walk out of the theater. We’re going to have to live this one but it’s still better to die on your feet as a free Citizen than to live on your knees as a Government Subject.
21 boberinyetagain // Apr 27, 2009 at 3:41 pm
Truly scary stuff here…
S. 9 Bill Text: Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the “Stronger Economy, Stronger Borders Act of 2009”. SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS. It is the sense of Congress that Congress should enact, and the President should sign, legislation to strengthen the economy, recognize the heritage of the United States as a nation of immigrants, and amend the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.) by– (1) providing more effective border and employment enforcement; (2) preventing illegal immigration; and (3) reforming and rationalizing avenues for legal immigration.
Speaking as an American indian (Cherokee) I wish that WE had enacted much stricter immigration laws. We’d be much better off. But, now that the cat’s out of that bag…let’s try and recall that all white/black folks are interlopers and to arbitrarily select the brown folks for exclusion seems a tad silly…now, if you want to keep the Irish out, then you’ll get some support
22 upnorthlurkin // Apr 27, 2009 at 3:53 pm
Just make sure you pinkos let us know just when to believe prez. Pinocchio….since according to CNN, he only tells the whole truth about half the time…. heh! The change y’all had hoped for is it?!!
23 Laughing@You // Apr 27, 2009 at 4:25 pm
“Just make sure you pinkos let us know just when to believe prez. Pinocchio…”
Lurch,
I wish you’d have asked sooner! Go ahead dear, start now! I’ll be sure to let you know when to stop.
For all the pinkos,
Everthink?
24 Laughing@You // Apr 27, 2009 at 4:36 pm
About that, “since according to CNN, he only tells the whole truth about half the time…” part.
You know better than to listen to the biased MSM! Besides, even if it’s so, that’s a 50% improvement over the scrupleless chimp, and his evil trainer.
Everthink?
25 boberinyetagain // Apr 27, 2009 at 4:44 pm
“pinkos”??? really??? you went THERE?
next I’ll likely get “cooties” of something equally dreadful…oh the horror…
26 boberinyetagain // Apr 27, 2009 at 4:45 pm
pinkos?
27 boberinyetagain // Apr 27, 2009 at 4:48 pm
lay makes a good point…NOW the MSM is reliable? what about the study showing that CNN only tells the whole truth 1/4 of the time?
So, if they tell 1/4 of the truth about Obama telling 1/2 the truth then….my head hurts…too much “cipherin” for this here “pinko”
28 Laughing@You // Apr 27, 2009 at 5:50 pm
Say,Rita-of-Sunland
Did Bush own his own limo, or pay for the gas? Besides all of Obama’s aircraft are all “hand me downs”. I want to see a stealth Air Force One, and an Apache Marine One, that would both stimulate the aircraft industry, and give you more whine, and spit about.
Besides President Obama was elected president by the people, not appointed by the court.
Everthink?
29 JamesonLewis3rd // Apr 27, 2009 at 7:20 pm
I find it comical that BHO apologists demonstrate time and again that BHO is simply emulating everybody else before him [George W. Bush in particular] (another lie, of course); this way he bears no personal responsibility for anything and is thus able to concentrate on partying into the night.
Now, that’s what I call change, dawg.
The mind reels at the possibilities available to BHO and his criminal henchpeople in the next 100 days to dismantle what is left of The United States of America; especially after what we’ve seen him do to us up to this point. He’s just getting warmed up, flexing, in preparation for our destruction at his entitled, murderous hands.
30 Fred Sinclair // Apr 27, 2009 at 7:53 pm
It’s about that time of year again:
Most people don’t know that back in 1912, Hellmann’s mayonnaise was manufactured in England. In fact, the Titanic was carrying 12,000 jars of the condiment scheduled for delivery in Vera Cruz, Mexico, which was to be the next port of call for the great ship after its stop in New York.
This would have been the largest single shipment of mayonnaise ever delivered to Mexico. But as we know, the great ship did not make it to New York. The ship hit an iceberg and sank, and the cargo was forever lost.
The people of Mexico, who were crazy about mayonnaise, and were eagerly awaiting its delivery, were disconsolate at the loss. Their anguish was so great, that they declared a National Day of Mourning, which they still observe to this day.
The National Day of Mourning occurs each year on May 5th and is known, of course, as Sinko de Mayo.
WHAT?? You expected something educational from me?
31 JamesonLewis3rd // Apr 27, 2009 at 7:56 pm
I scored 17 on the Obama Test!
No applause, please.
32 JamesonLewis3rd // Apr 27, 2009 at 8:00 pm
BHO and his Democrat party think pandemics are funny.
Fred~~
Thanks for the laugh.
33 RightWingNutter // Apr 27, 2009 at 8:06 pm
The assault vehicle control program should not overlook certain medium delivery vans. They look innocuous but many of these long range assault weapons are equipped with semi-automatic transmissions. And due to their heavy weight they are even more deadly than the smaller caliber full automatic vehicles.
34 Cars Sales Crash | World News // Apr 27, 2009 at 8:17 pm
[...] whisper campaign is designed both to curry favor with the anti-car lobby, and to boost the economy [...]Weak Demand for Luxury Cars Hurts Audi By CHRISTOPH RAUWALD FRANKFURT — Audi AG said Monday that [...]
35 Fred Sinclair // Apr 27, 2009 at 8:18 pm
The Amnesty bill is astounding, but then treason usually is. Actually, I’m not so much astounded as I am disgusted. Although I shouldn’t even be disgusted. As Rush is so often quoted; “It’s a simple answer, ‘Liberals are Liberals’, that sums it up.”. I carefully read every word of the bill and traitors are traitors, no matter where they’re born or how they spell their name. Benedict Arnold looks really good compared to some of our American Senators and Representatives today. Removing the borders smacks of treason to me.
“Treason doeth never prosper, what’s the reason? For if it prosper, none dare call it treason.” – John Harington
36 JamesonLewis3rd // Apr 27, 2009 at 9:16 pm
I wonder.
I wonder if BHO and his Democrat gang of criminals are intentionally attempting to foment civil war as this would give them the opening they need to attempt to crush all Freedom-Loving Patriots, burn our Constitution and fill their coffers.
They’ll be sorely disappointed, and that’s something I’m not wondering about.
37 R.A.M. // Apr 28, 2009 at 12:09 am
I must admit, when I first saw this story, I was VERY EXCITED, then I realized that it said, “Obama mulls–”, when I thought it said, “Obama mauled—”, and was anticipating that there had been an “incident” with “BO” the Portugese Water Dog.
38 MajorDomo // Apr 28, 2009 at 1:05 am
Fred 20: “… it will be only because you don’t understand the bill and it’s ramifications.”
.
Fred, you’ve identified all elected Democrats and those who elected them!
Well, today was another bad day for Obummer. In addition to the stupid waste associated with AF1’s flyby, (reminescent of The Sleaze’s shuting down LAX for hours while he got a haircut) there was also the fighter plane(s) that were accompanying it. Cost to taxpayers? Don’t ask the “news” media! Then there was the horrible mixup on Obummer’s speech machine (the Teleprompter). Isn’t it amazing the Jekyll-and-Hyde act this pretender demonstrates? More amazing still is the fact that so many people are so dense that they can’t even see it! Proof, I suppose, that the Obummer Ecollapse is complete.
39 Topics about Laughter | Obama Mulls ‘Assault-Vehicle’ Ban to Spur Car Sales // Apr 28, 2009 at 1:31 am
[...] Sandra Block placed an interesting blog post on Obama Mulls â [...]
40 Laughing@You // Apr 28, 2009 at 1:54 am
“More amazing still is the fact that so many people are so dense that they can’t even see it!”
I know just what you mean Major! I often can’t see the picture in those Hidden Image Stereograms, and somebody always get frustrated and impatient with me.
On the other hand, I did put a bid in over at eBay for a potato that looked exactly like that Tricky Dick Nixon, but somebody out bid me, and I lost out on that one.
Then there was that time when people said there was a image of the Virgin Mary in the window of that church downtown, but it just looked like an oil smear of that Halfback of Notre Dame to me.
But other than that, I never see things that aren’t there. Has this happened to you before? When was the first time you became aware of this? Have you always been a “Conservative”?
I saw this doctor on the television were worked with them a lot. He said they’re liable to see almost anything sometimes. Some of them think they see these things because they are real “special people”.
Many times it has occurred to me that there are a whole bunch of “special people” here, and you and Fred have always seemed “extra special” to me.
Everthink?
41 Laughing@You // Apr 28, 2009 at 2:02 am
Talk about your “special people”, have you two been watching Jameson? I wouldn’t let that bird handle any matches, if you know what I mean.
Well, I’m outta here, later dudes.
Everthink?
42 onlineanalyst // Apr 28, 2009 at 6:49 am
Who is behind the Bush administration show-trial movement? One guess.
http://spectator.org/archives/2009/04/28/soros-show-trials
BTW The “airshow” over NYC was certainly a waste of taxpayer resources and jet fuel. Was this “photo op” supposed to be a stunning backdrop to divert America from the antics of the failed Obama presidency… in 100 days? The Fresh Prince of Bill Ayers has much to answer for in panicking a city in order to stroke his own ego through a never-ending campaign. Mission accomplished, Ackbar? The WH and its resources are not your playthings.
43 Alphecca » Heh! // Apr 28, 2009 at 6:50 am
[...] This is funny: Since the Obama administration’s talk of banning so-called ‘assault weapons’ has resulted in a huge spike in semi-automatic weapon sales nationwide, the White House has recently begun a covert ‘whisper campaign’ suggesting the president might also ban U.S.-manufactured cars and trucks with fully-automatic transmissions, now dubbed ‘assault vehicles’. [...]
44 Ms RightWing, Ink // Apr 28, 2009 at 9:09 am
Nothing more dangerous than a fully loaded automatic car with low air pressure in the tires
’nuff said
45 Scott Ott // Apr 28, 2009 at 9:16 am
This post is now making its way up through the ranks on Digg, the social bookmarking site. If you wish to help it gain greater distribution, visit Digg and … you know … digg it.
46 boberinyetagain // Apr 28, 2009 at 9:27 am
Nice work Scott…the world is catching on!
47 Maggie // Apr 28, 2009 at 9:56 am
I lovingly named my assault vehicle/ weapon
the “obummer”.It is so old that I must send for parts to Cuba.
48 JamesonLewis3rd // Apr 28, 2009 at 12:07 pm
Why am I not surprised that Specter is “coming out” ?
49 boberinyetagain // Apr 28, 2009 at 12:10 pm
It’s about time, that man is just adorble what with his little bald head and whatnot…
50 Laughing@You // Apr 28, 2009 at 12:17 pm
Arlen Specter Switches Parties!
Arlen Specter announced today the he is fed up with “The Pary of NO!”, and offers a resounding, “Yes We Can!”, as he becomes a Democrat!
Together with Al Franken, that makes sixty!!!
“The Party of No!” to now officially become “The Party of Whatever, Dude”.
Everthink?
51 Godfrey // Apr 28, 2009 at 1:00 pm
Everthink: “he is fed up with “The Pary of NO!”
Actually, despite what Specter may have said in whatever statement he issued, his real motivation is probably that he would have lost the primary to his more conservative opponent. Switching parties was the only way he could hope to retain his seat.
But the Dems do now have a filibuster-proof majority, a fact which I think they owe in large part to the Republican tendency over the last eight years to embrace a socially repressive form of theocratic populism that most people in the country find distasteful.
I hope the Republicans wake up and find their way back to their small-government, live-and-let-live roots.
52 boberinyetagain // Apr 28, 2009 at 2:18 pm
fess up, y’all are going to miss him!
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Pennsylvania Republican Senator Arlen Specter said on Tuesday he will switch parties, moving Democrats closer to a 60-vote Senate majority that would allow them to break Republican procedural roadblocks.
53 upnorthlurkin // Apr 28, 2009 at 3:50 pm
Good riddence.
Y’all let us know how y’all like one party rule, ‘kay?! Since you’re all so much smarter than the rest of us, it’ll all be good….right?!!
54 gafisher // Apr 28, 2009 at 4:02 pm
Godfrey Re#51: “Actually, despite what Specter may have said in whatever statement he issued, his real motivation is probably that he would have lost the primary to his more conservative opponent.
Well said, and hopefully as true of the General Election as of the Primary.
55 gafisher // Apr 28, 2009 at 4:37 pm
Bober Re#52, Specter’s been unfailingly unreliable as a Republican, and of course before that he was an unreliable Democrat. For all that, he’s been far from the Dem “leadership” on security and the 2nd Amendment and I seriously doubt his voting will be any different just because he’s got a different letter after his roster listing. As for those sixty votes — well, just don’t count on his as a given.
56 boberinyetagain // Apr 28, 2009 at 4:55 pm
gafisher, I understand…Specter is a local boy…I kinda like him, actually wish more were like him in that (as you rightly observe) the letter in front of his name does nothing to sway his vote. Once elected it shouldn’t be a factor for any of them IMHO
But then, I’m neither letter myself so…
57 MajorDomo // Apr 28, 2009 at 7:39 pm
My #38: Surprise, surprise!! WCBS posted the cost of AF1 ($60,00 per hour), and mentioned the fighter costs but with no numbers. At least they took a stab at the dollar cost of this unbelievably STUPID event. But it’s just an other of a lengthening list of similar Obummer administration “missteps”.
58 Godfrey // Apr 28, 2009 at 8:03 pm
Gafisher: The general election will be tricky for the Republicans now. From what I know of PA, the conservatives are “very” conservative but they’re a minority (PA is a blue state). I don’t think going more conservative is going to help the GOP, there or anywhere else; in fact that is probably what’s been hurting them nationwide since 2006 (along with the war, of course).
People seem to be embracing a hands-on fiscal policy, which I think will prove disastrous…but they seem to be leaning toward a more hands-off social policy, which the libertarian in me really likes… but which also bodes ill for the latest incarnation of the Republican Party.
I’m not sure it matters in the long run. 20 years from now I doubt we’ll recognize either party based on today’s standards.
59 It Occurs To Me « William The Coroner’s Forensic Files // Apr 28, 2009 at 8:38 pm
[...] to re-equip the Indian and Pakistani armies. Let alone ammunition, which is difficult to find. Some folks have suggested that President Obama start a rumor that he is going to ban “Assault … I point out, however, there is a big difference between firearms and cars. When I pull the trigger [...]
60 I Just Want to Point Out « William The Coroner’s Forensic Files // Apr 28, 2009 at 10:15 pm
[...] to re-equip the Indian and Pakistani armies. Let alone ammunition, which is difficult to find. Some folks have suggested that President Obama start a rumor that he is going to ban “Assault … I point out, however, there is a big difference between firearms and cars. When I pull the trigger [...]
61 Standard Mischief » no one cares about your letter writing campaign when you’re just another pseudonym user on the tubes of web // Apr 28, 2009 at 11:08 pm
[...] Update 28apr09: Scrappleface does it better, funnier and less cheesier. [...]
62 Laughing@You // Apr 29, 2009 at 12:30 am
“Y’all let us know how y’all like one party rule, ‘kay?! Since you’re all so much smarter than the rest of us, it’ll all be good….right?!!”
What’s to lose? It’s not like Republicans have a rational point of view. You all have been wrong about everything for the last decade!
I think there should be a Conservative balance in Congress, but the Republican Party is not really able to provide that anymore.
To win, try issues; not smear.
Everthink?
63 gafisher // Apr 29, 2009 at 6:41 am
Godfrey Re#58: “20 years from now I doubt we’ll recognize either party based on today’s standards.”
Time wounds all heels; both of the major parties have fallen from what they represented 20 years ago, and looking back 40 is like staring up a cliff. But the error is in voters who maintain loyalty to an organization rather than to principles and ideals.
64 gafisher // Apr 29, 2009 at 6:48 am
“… the president might also ban U.S.-manufactured cars and trucks with fully-automatic transmissions, now dubbed ‘assault vehicles’.”
It’s hits that count, not shots. I keep my bolt-action four-on-the-floor well oiled and practice, practice, practice.
65 Godfrey // Apr 29, 2009 at 1:32 pm
gafisher: “the error is in voters who maintain loyalty to an organization rather than to principles and ideals.”
Well said indeed.
66 A stimulus theory that just might work! | The Illegitimate President // May 1, 2009 at 12:14 am
[...] (2009-04-27) — Since the Obama administration’s talk of banning so-called ‘assault weapons’ … [...]
67 Friday night funny: Obama to ban fully-automatic assault vehicles « Wintery Knight Blog // May 1, 2009 at 5:02 pm
[...] Obama to ban fully-automatic assault vehicles Scott Ott at Scrappleface.com has the scoop on Obama’s plan to spur new vehicle sales. No, it’s isn’t lowering the sales tax on new vehicle sales, like communist China did. [...]
You must log in to post a comment.